Egyptian Union Law Decree May Mean Government Interference, Unions Say

Labor unions and worker rights organizations are decrying a newly decreed amendment to Egypt’s Mubarak-era trade union law, which threatens freedom of association and the right to organize independent and representative trade unions.

The Center for Trade Union and Workers’ Services, the Egyptian Democratic Labor Congress and the Egyptian Federation of Independent Trade Unions have released statements (EFITU, CTUWS/EDLC) regarding the amendment, which sets a mandatory retirement age for union leaders and grants the government the authority to appoint board members of unions to fill vacant seats. By leaving the prior union law largely in place, the move by the Egyptian government effectively disallows recognition of the new, independent unions formed since the revolution, because the prior law allows for only a single labor union structure, a violation of international labor standards.

The amendment was signed the same day President Morsi issued the controversial constitutional declaration. The independent unions of Egypt are also concerned about the latest draft of the new constitution, which, among other things  does not guarantee freedom of association for workers or protect unions from outside interference.

Reaching Workers on the Job Key to HIV/AIDS Prevention

Roseline Mosibudi Nkgapele, a member of the National Union of Metal Workers of South Africa (NUMSA), has made it her mission to educate workers about HIV/AIDS. The virus is particularly cruel in that it strikes workers in their prime, affecting their ability to remain productive on the job and earn a living wage. Prevention and care is an urgent issue for workers and their unions.

When Nkgapele, a 10-year employee at AutoZone, an auto parts wholesaler and retailer in South Africa’s Gauteng Province, heard about the Solidarity Center’s project on workplace HIV/AIDS, “Be Faithful, Be Tested, Be Union,” she wanted her workplace to be included in the project.

Jean Lindsay, Autozone’s human resources manager, agreed, and they requested the Solidarity Center’s assistance in developing an HIV prevention and management strategy. As a result, Solidarity Center staff held multiple trainings which in turn empowered dozens of new workplace peer educators and sparked the creation of a new committee to shepherd HIV prevention at Autozone. Key to the trainings is educating men on the effectiveness of circumcision in preventing HIV/AIDS. To date, more than half of Autozone’s male workforce, have undergone circumcision.

“Be Faithful, Be Tested, Be Union” is funded by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention through the President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR).

The partnership with the Solidarity Center and NUMSA, begun in August 2011, was the first time labor and management worked together on an issue, said Lindsay. Now, “we are feeling that there is a significant difference in our workplace: Workers are aware of their HIV status, men are undergoing medical circumcision that could potentially save their lives and their spouses, greater knowledge and awareness was gained and the team is empowered. Management and the union are united over the same cause and great relationships and partnerships have been formed.”

South African unions are at the forefront of the fight against HIV/AIDS. In South Africa, the Solidarity Center partners with the 302,000-member NUMSA, the largest affiliate of the Congress of South African Trade Unions (COSATU). From October 2008 to September 2011, the Solidarity Center in South Africa implemented HIV/AIDS workplace activities at more than 100 jobsites, ranging in size from 50 to 3,000 workers. To date, the Solidarity Center planned and faciliated small group sessions for more than 20,000 workers through HIV/AIDS workplace education.

Most recently, the Solidarity Center in September held a Voluntary Medical Male Circumcision drive attended by 2,000 men. (Click here to check out all World AIDS Day actions the Solidarity is sponsoring or taking part in.) Educating men through the workplace is extremely effective, says Solidarity Center South Africa Senior Specialist Gillian Cassell. By first getting male union shop stewards involved, their participation in circumcision overcomes the uncertainty other men may have, and enables them to follow their lead.

“The workplace at Autozone shows that men are comfortable sharing what they’re doing, something as intimate as medical male circumcision,” says Cassell. “We’re seeing the peer pressure approach work.”

As the global community gets set to mark December 1 as World AIDS Day, reaching workers on the job and educating them about HIV prevention is an essential element in slowing—and ultimately ending—HIV/AIDS. Worldwide, the number of those newly infected continues to fall: Adults and children acquiring HIV infection in 2011 was 2.5 million, 20 percent lower than in 2001. The sharpest declines were in the Caribbean (42 percent) and sub-Saharan Africa (25 percent).

Yet there is much work to do: Globally, 34 million people were living with HIV/AIDS at the end of 2011, and sub-Saharan Africa remains the most severely affected, with nearly one in every 20 adults accounting for 69 percent of the people living with HIV worldwide. In South Africa, the HIV infection rate is nearly 18 percent for people between ages 15 and 49.

More Information

• The World Health Organization—Between 2011-2015, the World Aids Day theme is “Getting to Zero: Zero New HIV Infections. Zero Discrimination. Zero AIDS-related Deaths.”

• World AIDS Campaign—The United World AIDS Campaign site includes resources, country-specific news on HIV/AIDS and more.

• World AIDS Day Timeline, 1988-2011

Paying with Their Lives: The High Cost of Cheap Clothing

Cheap clothes come at great cost in Bangladesh.

Last weekend, more than 110 garment workers died in a fire that burned the Tazreen Fashion Ltd. garment factory, located in the outskirts of Bangladesh’s capital, Dhaka.  Women and men working overtime on the production lines—located on the second and third floors of the building—were trapped when fire broke out in the first-floor warehouse. With no fire escapes, the only exits were stairs leading to the first floor, where the fire raged. Workers scrambled toward the roof, jumped from upper floors, or were trampled by their panic-stricken co-workers. Some could not run fast enough and were lost to the flames and smoke.

The grieving aunt of one of the workers told the Solidarity Center’s Program Officer Rukshana Arzoo, “My nephew called his mother and said, ‘I will die as I will jump from the fourth floor. Please come and get my body’.”

According to news reports, Tazreen Fashion earns $36 million a year supplying garments to major buyers in the West. Before the embers had cooled, the company’s management promised to pay 100,000 taka (about $1,235), to families of the workers who perished. While this is the legal compensation rate for a worker killed on the job, it is a mere pittance to a multimillion-dollar exporter. And it raises a serious question: Is the life of a Bangladeshi garment worker worth only $1,235?

In Bangladesh’s garment factories—and in others around Asia—the relentless drive for cheap production often entails dangerous facilities, below-poverty wages, cramped conditions and an absence of health and safety programs. And it is the workers who pay. ABC News has best summed up the situation: “Bangladesh has become a favorite of many American retailers, drawn by the cheapest labor in the world, as low as 21 cents an hour, producing clothes in crowded conditions that would be illegal in the U.S. In the past five years, more than 700 Bangladeshi garment workers have died in factory fires.”

The trend is alarming. And instead of making real commitments to listening to workers, ensuring that they can organize to address concerns, building better factories and implementing programs to ensure the safety of the women and men whose labor generates enormous sums for business owners and the country, the garment industry has offered nebulous conspiracy theories for the Tazreen and other fires.

Yet, according to the Associated Press, “Authorities have formed three committees to look into the incident. An industry group has suggested that sabotage may be to blame, though fire officials have said it was not the fire itself, but the poor safety measures that caused the high death toll.”

No matter how the fire started, the factory was a death trap and its management must answer for the lives lost on its watch.

The Solidarity Center has been supporting workers’ rights—including providing fire safety training—in Bangladesh for years. We know from experience that in low-wage economies in general, companies find little reason to protect the rights and interests of workers—and that corporate self-regulation has proven a faulty tool for ensuring healthy and dignified workplaces. Meanwhile, vulnerable and impoverished workers cannot fight alone for their rights and, without the relative strength of a union to represent them, their lives hang in the balance.

So what has to happen to keep blood off Bangladesh-made clothes sold in Western stores? In the immediate term, the government of Bangladesh and the garment industry must pursue a transparent and serious investigation into the deadly Tazreen fire, prosecute those responsible, provide just compensation for the families of the dead and injured, and implement a serious and comprehensive fire safety and monitoring program.

But if authorities and buyers are serious about preventing a greater death toll, workers—whose lives are at risk and who know best how dangerous their workplace can be—must be able to assert their rights, organize unions with their co-workers, raise safety concerns and demand better working conditions according to their best judgment.

As eminent economist Debapriya Bhattacharya told Bangladesh’s Daily News this week, “Trade unions should be allowed since other institutions seem to have failed to protect the workers’ safety and interests… Otherwise, this type of incident will occur again and again.”

Decent Work and the Valentin Urusov Case

This is an excerpt from the Global Labour Column by Anna Wolañska, international secretary of NSZZ “Solidarnoœæ” and a member of the governing Body of the International Labor Organization (ILO).

Like Russian politics, labor relations in Russia are rife with contradictions.

On the one hand, [Russian President] Vladimir Putin addressed the International Labor Conference in 2011 and marched with the trade unions in a 2012 May Day demonstration, portraying himself as a supporter of progressive labor legislation and the notion of social partnership. Russia has an established system of tripartism: no social issue can be decided on without being discussed by the country’s permanent tripartite commission….

On the other hand…the International Labor Organization (ILO) Committee on Freedom of Association issued its report on a complaint from Russian and international trade unions. The complaint, filed with the ILO in 2011, is brimming with facts that paint a picture at odds with the official one: constantly increasing pressure on trade union activists, harassment and persecution, threats of physical violence, repressive rulings against trade union organizers by local courts, and a ban on distributing trade union leaflets and educational materials for workers. This is all happening in parallel with the destruction of the social welfare system in a country where wages are shamefully low for a developed European nation.

The complaint submitted to the ILO describes, among other cases, the story of independent trade union activist Valentin Urusov (born 1974). Trade unionists in Russia and around the world have been campaigning for his release for several years. His story is not only an example of determination and sacrifice, but also a vivid illustration of the true relations between capital and labor in today’s Russia, where the largest employers are colluding with corrupt government officials to purposefully and methodically destroy the seeds of the new trade union movement, while Kremlin officials speak about social partnership.

Continue reading the full article from the Global Labour Column by Anna Wolañska.

Bangladesh Protests Deaths of More than 100 Garment Workers

The Solidarity Center joins the international labor and human rights communities in expressing sorrow over the unnecessary and tragic loss of life at a Bangladesh garment factory over the weekend. Between 112 and 120 Bangladeshi garment workers—most of them women—have been confirmed killed in one of the nation’s worst industrial disasters in recent memory.

“Our hearts go out to the families and friends of those who lost their lives and to those who have been injured,” said Tim Ryan, Asia regional director for the Solidarity Center.  “Workers should not have to risk their lives to make clothes.”

Even as the death toll continued to rise and many garment factories shut down as thousands of people protest the tragedy, another fire broke out at a 12-story garment factory on Monday, where eight workers were injured. Hundreds of Bangladeshi garment workers have been killed on the job in the past few years.

At the time of the fire, some 600 workers were in the factory, which employs 1,500 people and has sales of $35 million a year, according to the New York Times. Many jumped to their deaths trying to escape from the six-story building outside Dhaka, and those unable to escape the blaze were burned alive, according to the Clean Clothes Campaign. NBC News quotes Maj. Mohammad Mahbub, fire department operations director, who said there were no fire exits: “Had there been at least one emergency exit through outside the factory, the casualties would have been much lower.”

Ruhul Amin, general secretary of Bangladesh Federation of Workers Solidarity (BFWS), said that although the Prime Minister stated factory exits should not be locked during working hours, “the garment workers of Bangladesh now don’t have confidence in the inspection department of Bangladesh.  So I am requesting the buyers to take care the issue very seriously. I also demand judiciary inquiry for the incident.”

The owners of the factory must be punished, said Aleaya, general secretary of Bangladesh Industrial Garment Workers Federation (BGIWF) and “should take responsibility for the injured workers.”

Bangladesh is now the world’s second-largest clothes exporter with overseas garment sales topping $19 billion last year, or 80 percent of total national exports. Yet the base pay for a garment worker in Bangladesh is the equivalent of $37 a month—the same monthly amount it costs to buy food for one person.

There are no local unions at the Tazreen Fashions factory to represent workers and ensure safe work sites. In fact, Bangladeshi garment workers struggling to gain safe working conditions and decent pay face huge opposition. Earlier this year, union activist Aminul Islam, a leader of the Bangladesh Garment and Industrial Workers Federation (BGIWF), a Solidarity Center partner, was tortured and murdered.

Police attacks against demonstrating workers demanding better working conditions and higher wages are widespread, according to a 2012 report by the United Nations.

The violence against Bangladeshi workers has captured the attention of human rights activists and policymakers in the United States. It was the subject of human rights hearing in Congress and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, on a trip this year to Bangladesh, specifically addressed the unsolved murder of Islam.

Pin It on Pinterest